* = hyperlink CONTENTS | ABOUT| Be a LIGHT | CONTACT = vance@realitycheq.com
Copyright © 2004-2018 Dr. Vance Coan *
|
* = hyperlink CONTENTS | ABOUT| Be a LIGHT | CONTACT = vance@realitycheq.com Copyright © 2004-2018 Dr. Vance Coan *
|
|
Face Book My Story - Archive
2 TOPICS WE DARE NOT TALK ABOUT:
PART
1:
Yet, as soon as more than 1 person inhabits
Synopsis of Part 1:
yes, avoid those that conduct themselves inappropriately & of course never allow
such to provoke us into behaving as we ought NOT.
PART 2: NOW ... into the other NO GO TOPIC, even more base to sociological development ...
RELIGION, a term synonymous
to PHILOSOPHY, as both are
foundation-ally about life associated understandings/beliefs/ethics/adherence to
related concepts.
Clearly, religion promotes philosophical concepts. There is no religion without
philosophy, as religions involve collective philosophical perspectives.
All of this was quite acceptable, until recent a sub-categorical topic for
another time.
Instability in communication often activates at the mention of God(s) or any
entity that appears dictatorial about what is right & wrong another point for
another time.
These short clips are to acknowledge but not get distracted by
sub-topics that trigger subjective reactions that prevent people from getting to
the core FACTS that cannot objectively be disputed
providing a platform that
then can facilitate clearly expounding on related issues.
PROCEEDING TO A DIRECT FACTUAL PATHWAY TO UNDENIABLE TRUTH
Concluding on the existence
or none-existence of god(s), without
factual evidence is irrational.
THEORY
is not evidence, rather consideration, thus not fact.
Promoting such as fact, is deception, if not outright lying
the so-called
half-ape half-man artifacts, were all debunked by the scientific community in
the mid-later 20th century
yet, still in school science textbooks
today.
The missing link has never been found.
More later, from the perspective of a doctorate in the sciences.
Theories are fine for consideration, but are not facts.
A theory may be used to structure an hypothesis for a scientific experiment,
that may prove a
YES,
NO or
INCONCLUSIVE result.
If facts are not available for a conclusion required to make a decision of
consequence, considerations may help make a calculated choice, which admit-ably
has a calculated risk.
Objective evaluation
produces stable subjective emotions,
which animate life. Reversing this
formula produces instability.
THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD IS VALID
however, scientists are very capable of deception, fudging & outright lying.
----------------------------
OKAY
let us simplify a major quagmire
there
are thousands of religions, yet they
all fall under
only 3 categories:
There is NO GOD atheism.
There is ONE GOD monotheism.
There is MORE THAN ONE GOD
polytheism.
1 of these 3 statements must be correct & 2 of these statements must be
incorrect regardless of the answer.
Thus 2 of these categories, represents thousands of religions, which represent
millions, if not Billions of misdirected people on the foundations of their
existence
WORSE
KILLING PEOPLE FOR NOT BELIEVING WHAT THEY BELIEVE !!!
No wonder people are not only confused but infuriated concerning religion
many
unfortunately react
throwing out the baby with the dirty bathwater.
--------------------------------
THERE IS A TRUTH
prematurely
concluding on what the truth is or isnt, prior to making potentially
important life decisions, with potentially eternal consequences
HASTILY
is not wise.
Life portrayed as a white piece of paper,
that gets tainted as it ages:
The truth can generally be clearly displayed to a
clean life-sheet in a matter of a
few paragraphs to a few pages.
As life moves forward, an aged tainted
life-sheet generally becomes more blotched with assumed perceived facts, of
which requires more consideration when approaching
such with concepts that challenge the mental inventory
often NOT worth the
effort to influence, if there was not more at stake than most realize. There are
exceptions.
Thus, it is generally easier to introduce younger, than older people, to new
opposing concepts.
Further, it was easier to approach younger people on these matters 30-50 years
ago, than now because child rearing & academic standards have clearly degraded,
producing a newer generation, not as disciplined, less respectful, more
rebellious & with inferior life skills, though tech savvy. Again, there are
exceptions.
PART 2 continued PART 2b:
In summation
RELIGION IS FOUNDATIONALLY LACKING WITHOUT ITS PHILOSOPHICAL
ELEMENT & PHILOSOPHICAL EFFECT IS MINIMIZED WITHOUT ITS RELIGIOUS ELEMENT.
Neither RELIGION nor PHILOSOPHY are good or bad, rather instruments used for
good & bad.
Knowing that terms like religion, philosophy, judging & others
50-100 years
ago were used & accepted in their correct context, it is not that these terms
needed to develop, rather they have digressed
why?
Further, this trend is in play in numerous areas of our culture
for a purpose,
of which the trend is not new, rather cyclical
for intentional purposes.
More later
-----------------------------------
Wherever their are 2 or more people, there is politics ... both positive & negative.
As p
Good people abdicating participation in this realm, affords the dictatorial rule of tyranny.
Evolution or Adaptation ?
>
Proof
in the Stars
|
|
|
